VRFish Oppose Proposed Commercial Increase in Port Phillip Bay

News and Information from VRFish
User avatar
Andrews
Rank: Premium Member
Rank: Premium Member
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2019 2:41 pm
Location: Bellarine Peninsula
Has liked: 268 times
Likes received: 766 times

VRFish Oppose Proposed Commercial Increase in Port Phillip Bay

Post by Andrews » Fri Feb 18, 2022 2:22 pm

VRFish Oppose Proposed Commercial Increase in Port Phillip Bay
https://www.vrfish.com.au/2022/02/11/vr ... illip-bay/
FEBRUARY 11, 2022

We regularly hear from recfishers just how great the fishing is in the Bay now that the netters have been removed. Can you imagine what our fishing will be like if the remaining commercials have no limit on their bycatch?

VRFish is calling on recfishers to oppose a proposal by Seafood Industry Victoria (SIV) for their long-line commercial fishers to have an unlimited bycatch limit in Port Phillip Bay.

A bipartisan election promise in 2014 was to remove commercial netters from Corio Bay and Port Phillip Bay with 8 remaining as long-line fishers and allowed to catch 11 tonnes of snapper (per licence) only. The fishery resource was to be allocated to us, recfishers. This was the intent of parliament with the passing of the Fisheries Amendment Act 2015.

Now SIV have proposed to the Minister for Fishing and Boating that the remaining long-line fishers should have no limits on their bycatch. Further to that, Victorian Fisheries Authority have provided an unacceptable counteroffer of allowing 232 tonnes of catch. There has been NO consultation with the recreational sector. This is a clear breach of the consultation principles in the Fisheries Act 1995.

VRFish will not support either proposal. Tell the Minister Melissa Horne that you oppose this proposal from SIV and the VFA and will not accept any addition to the commercial sectors catch in the Bay.

Contact Melissa Horne via: melissa.horne@parliament.vic.gov.au
Attachments
2.jpg
Amateur Fisherman, South West Victoria / - Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/fishingandrew/ Sponsors: Yamashita Australia, Sunline & Gomexus.

User avatar
Laze
Rank: Premium Member
Rank: Premium Member
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 8:02 am
Has liked: 18 times
Likes received: 16 times

Re: VRFish Oppose Proposed Commercial Increase in Port Phillip Bay

Post by Laze » Fri Feb 18, 2022 10:52 pm

Thanks for posting this Andrews.

I may be out of my depth here with the politics of commercial fishing/recreational fishing and the overall stance of this forum.

That being said I've gone ahead and emailed the minister as I am definitely an advocate for a sustainable future and if that means less pressure on PPB's ecosystem I am all for it.

If anyone else feels the same heres a copy and paste of a quick email draft I made based on the post above, if you want to use it as a template:

Dear Melissa Horne,

I am writing to you with regards to oppose a proposal by Seafood Industry Victoria (SIV) for their long-line commercial fishers to have an unlimited by catch limit in Port Phillip Bay. Further to that, Victorian Fisheries Authority (VFA) have provided an unacceptable counteroffer of allowing 232 tonnes of catch. There has been no consultation with the recreational sector. This is a clear breach of the consultation principles in the fisheries Act 1995.

I oppose SIV and VFA proposals and do not accept any addition to the commercial sectors catch in the bay.

As a recreational fisherman, i have a deep respect for the waters of Port Phillip Bay. I practice sustainable fishing so there is a future for our waters and so the next generation of fishermen/women have the same experience. As the Minister for Fishing and Boating, I trust you have the same interests in mind.
Rock hopper, sand dragger, mud slinger.

cobby
Rank: Murray Cod
Rank: Murray Cod
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:39 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Likes received: 324 times

Re: VRFish Oppose Proposed Commercial Increase in Port Phillip Bay

Post by cobby » Sat Feb 19, 2022 1:17 pm

Vrfish are a bunch of self absorbed, self serving fuckwits and have been for years. I'd take their foot stomping seriously if they bothered to highlight that we take a hell of a lot more than pros, even if they got their extra 232 tonnes, and had the nets they had before the ban.

Hell, if I could be bothered I'd write an email to Horne in favour of increased quota even if it's nothing more than a **** you gesture towards Vrfish

Seniorfisho
Rank: Snapper
Rank: Snapper
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 1:32 pm
Has liked: 798 times
Likes received: 433 times

Re: VRFish Oppose Proposed Commercial Increase in Port Phillip Bay

Post by Seniorfisho » Sat Feb 19, 2022 4:57 pm

cobby wrote:
Sat Feb 19, 2022 1:17 pm
Vrfish are a bunch of self absorbed, self serving fuckwits and have been for years. I'd take their foot stomping seriously if they bothered to highlight that we take a hell of a lot more than pros, even if they got their extra 232 tonnes, and had the nets they had before the ban.

Hell, if I could be bothered I'd write an email to Horne in favour of increased quota even if it's nothing more than a **** you gesture towards Vrfish
There must be a hell of a lot of mystery fishos around if they are taking more fish than the pros, most fishos fishing the bay are lucky to get a fish every trip. If it was up to me I would get rid of all pro fishos in PPB forever

User avatar
bowl
Rank: Premium Member
Rank: Premium Member
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:30 pm
Location: Wyndham Vale
Has liked: 292 times
Likes received: 559 times

Re: VRFish Oppose Proposed Commercial Increase in Port Phillip Bay

Post by bowl » Sat Feb 19, 2022 5:15 pm

Seniorfisho wrote:
Sat Feb 19, 2022 4:57 pm
cobby wrote:
Sat Feb 19, 2022 1:17 pm
Vrfish are a bunch of self absorbed, self serving fuckwits and have been for years. I'd take their foot stomping seriously if they bothered to highlight that we take a hell of a lot more than pros, even if they got their extra 232 tonnes, and had the nets they had before the ban.

Hell, if I could be bothered I'd write an email to Horne in favour of increased quota even if it's nothing more than a **** you gesture towards Vrfish
There must be a hell of a lot of mystery fishos around if they are taking more fish than the pros, most fishos fishing the bay are lucky to get a fish every trip. If it was up to me I would get rid of all pro fishos in PPB forever
Lucky to get one fish every trip ..c'mon they try to catch them by hand or something....

Fishing was fine when all netters where In bay.
To many boats kayak, helicopter , catch a fish,catch a fish

Seniorfisho
Rank: Snapper
Rank: Snapper
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 1:32 pm
Has liked: 798 times
Likes received: 433 times

Re: VRFish Oppose Proposed Commercial Increase in Port Phillip Bay

Post by Seniorfisho » Sun Feb 20, 2022 9:47 am

bowl wrote:
Sat Feb 19, 2022 5:15 pm
Seniorfisho wrote:
Sat Feb 19, 2022 4:57 pm
cobby wrote:
Sat Feb 19, 2022 1:17 pm
Vrfish are a bunch of self absorbed, self serving fuckwits and have been for years. I'd take their foot stomping seriously if they bothered to highlight that we take a hell of a lot more than pros, even if they got their extra 232 tonnes, and had the nets they had before the ban.

Hell, if I could be bothered I'd write an email to Horne in favour of increased quota even if it's nothing more than a **** you gesture towards Vrfish
There must be a hell of a lot of mystery fishos around if they are taking more fish than the pros, most fishos fishing the bay are lucky to get a fish every trip. If it was up to me I would get rid of all pro fishos in PPB forever
Lucky to get one fish every trip ..c'mon they try to catch them by hand or something....

Fishing was fine when all netters where In bay.
How many big snapper have you caught this year that is contributing to the angling pressure? If you believe the netters were fine then you have no idea of what the northern end of the bay was like in the 70's and 80's. your bag limit of whiting is 20 fish, do you think that puts angling pressure on whiting stocks? How many times have been fishing this year and caught donuts?, and by that i mean decent fish?

purple5ive
Rank: Premium Member
Rank: Premium Member
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:59 pm
Has liked: 567 times
Likes received: 1011 times

Re: VRFish Oppose Proposed Commercial Increase in Port Phillip Bay

Post by purple5ive » Sun Feb 20, 2022 10:24 am

cobby wrote:
Sat Feb 19, 2022 1:17 pm
I'd take their foot stomping seriously if they bothered to highlight that we take a hell of a lot more than pros, even if they got their extra 232 tonnes
Have you got some solid proof to back this claim up?
If you do then please post it up, I'd love to see it and be educated some more.

User avatar
re-tyred
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:54 am
Location: Lakes Entrance
Has liked: 375 times
Likes received: 937 times

Re: VRFish Oppose Proposed Commercial Increase in Port Phillip Bay

Post by re-tyred » Sun Feb 20, 2022 1:50 pm

This is a screen shot from page 17 of the document " state of Victorian recreational fishing" it clearly shows the majority of table fish caught in Victoria are caught by recreational anglers. Infact recreational fishers passed commercial fishing total catch back around the year 2000. Many reductions have been made to commercial fishing in Victoria. Meanwhile recreational angling has been increased dramatically. I do not have an opinion regarding increasing the commercial catch, however I do know that considerable research is conducted before changes to commercial or recreational limits.
If you don't have commercial fishers then the only fish you can buy is from farms or overseas. There is a place for controlled commercial wild fish catching. I am completely at ease about how Victorian fishing is managed. Fish have never been more plentiful. I have fished for over 60 years.
Attachments
Screenshot_20220220-143932.png
There's nothing . . . absolutely nothing . . . half so much worth doing as simply messing around in boats.
Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows (River Rat to Mole)

User avatar
4liters
Rank: Premium Member
Rank: Premium Member
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:05 am
Has liked: 6 times
Likes received: 673 times

Re: VRFish Oppose Proposed Commercial Increase in Port Phillip Bay

Post by 4liters » Sun Feb 20, 2022 1:51 pm

There is an unsourced claim on the SIV website saying that recreational fishors take more snapper than the pros. While they don't say how they arrived at that figure it wouldn't surprise me if they were right.

https://www.siv.com.au/port-phillip-bay-fishery.html
2015/16 Fisting Victoria Species comp total: 289cm
Brown Trout: 37cm
Flathead: 51cm; Squid: 36cm; Australian Salmon: 51cm; Snapper 46cm; Silver Trevally 23cm; KGW: 45cm
Major Sponsor: Rim Master Tackle

User avatar
re-tyred
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:54 am
Location: Lakes Entrance
Has liked: 375 times
Likes received: 937 times

Re: VRFish Oppose Proposed Commercial Increase in Port Phillip Bay

Post by re-tyred » Sun Feb 20, 2022 2:12 pm

4liters wrote:
Sun Feb 20, 2022 1:51 pm
There is an unsourced claim on the SIV website saying that recreational fishors take more snapper than the pros. While they don't say how they arrived at that figure it wouldn't surprise me if they were right.

https://www.siv.com.au/port-phillip-bay-fishery.html
According to catch statistics, there are around 7 times more snapper caught by recreational anglers than commercial fishers. KGWs it is about even.
There's nothing . . . absolutely nothing . . . half so much worth doing as simply messing around in boats.
Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows (River Rat to Mole)

Post Reply

Return to “VRFish (Victorian Recreational Fishing Peak-Body)”