So who had a clue...
-
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:59 pm
- Has liked: 567 times
- Likes received: 1011 times
-
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:59 pm
- Has liked: 567 times
- Likes received: 1011 times
Re: So who had a clue...
What would one write in regards to an email, If they dont fish the area but want it to remain open to fisherman?
Alternatively..
Would a petition including peoples digitally signed names and a general body covering the use of the yarra as a fishing destination be a better idea?
I doubt many will personally email. Special ones that dont fish it. A mass signed petition might generate more votes in favour via social media I would think.
Cheers
Alternatively..
Would a petition including peoples digitally signed names and a general body covering the use of the yarra as a fishing destination be a better idea?
I doubt many will personally email. Special ones that dont fish it. A mass signed petition might generate more votes in favour via social media I would think.
Cheers
- 4liters
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:05 am
- Has liked: 6 times
- Likes received: 673 times
Re: So who had a clue...
An email carries more weight because of the effort put into writing it.purple5ive wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 11:38 amWhat would one write in regards to an email, If they dont fish the area but want it to remain open to fisherman?
Alternatively..
Would a petition including peoples digitally signed names and a general body covering the use of the yarra as a fishing destination be a better idea?
I doubt many will personally email. Special ones that dont fish it. A mass signed petition might generate more votes in favour via social media I would think.
Cheers
Just say you’re a keen fisherman and you don’t want to lose the chance to fish these spots for trophy species like bream
2015/16 Fisting Victoria Species comp total: 289cm
Brown Trout: 37cm
Flathead: 51cm; Squid: 36cm; Australian Salmon: 51cm; Snapper 46cm; Silver Trevally 23cm; KGW: 45cm
Major Sponsor: Rim Master Tackle
Brown Trout: 37cm
Flathead: 51cm; Squid: 36cm; Australian Salmon: 51cm; Snapper 46cm; Silver Trevally 23cm; KGW: 45cm
Major Sponsor: Rim Master Tackle
- hornet
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:55 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has liked: 123 times
- Likes received: 258 times
Re: So who had a clue...
Should all the news media channels be alerted to the proposed fishing ban on the Yarra ? channel 7 /10 /9 ... easy to send an email to them to look into it.
He who has the most fishing rods WINS !
- 4liters
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:05 am
- Has liked: 6 times
- Likes received: 673 times
Re: So who had a clue...
You can try but I’m not sure it’d gain much traction while NSW is burning to the ground
2015/16 Fisting Victoria Species comp total: 289cm
Brown Trout: 37cm
Flathead: 51cm; Squid: 36cm; Australian Salmon: 51cm; Snapper 46cm; Silver Trevally 23cm; KGW: 45cm
Major Sponsor: Rim Master Tackle
Brown Trout: 37cm
Flathead: 51cm; Squid: 36cm; Australian Salmon: 51cm; Snapper 46cm; Silver Trevally 23cm; KGW: 45cm
Major Sponsor: Rim Master Tackle
- mazman
- Rank: Murray Cod
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:45 pm
- Has liked: 137 times
- Likes received: 455 times
Re: So who had a clue...
We are at a stage now where the consultation has been reopened so I believe the best avenue is to write in and voice your concerns.
They also said in their statement that we (recreational fishers) weren't the target of the proposal and I believe this indicates that the proposed changes weren't malicious towards fishos but rather ignored us, because we weren't the issue, without considering ramifications.
They also said in their statement that we (recreational fishers) weren't the target of the proposal and I believe this indicates that the proposed changes weren't malicious towards fishos but rather ignored us, because we weren't the issue, without considering ramifications.
Youtube channel:Hawkesy Fishing
-
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2016 8:08 pm
- Location: The Ocean
- Has liked: 412 times
- Likes received: 609 times
Re: So who had a clue...
Saw this today on my break and thought of you guys seems VRFish have done a good job here. Makes me consider paying the membership fee.
This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: viewtopic.php?f=14&p=349277#p349277 .
Any form of bullying on this forum will NOT BE TOLERATED!
This is your last warning!
Any form of bullying on this forum will NOT BE TOLERATED!
This is your last warning!
-
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:16 pm
- Has liked: 39 times
- Likes received: 356 times
Re: So who had a clue...
Great to here they want to speak to us humble fishermanducky wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 10:32 amGreat news guys. The consultation period has been reopened. Now we need people who fish the area (or don’t like the idea of being locked out) to submit an email.
Suggestions for an email: Briefly talk about
A) What fishing the Yarra and its bridges mean to you and how long you’ve been doing it
B) How often you fish there and how you fish there (i.e. how you get out of the way/ are aware of current laws)
C) if you believe you cause a safety issue or if one even exists
D) Would many people be upset if fishing here was banned?
Email to waterways@transportsafety.vic.gov.au
- Cc jaala.pulford@parliament.vic.gov.au
Even when they say it's only regu plate the commercial boats and rowers lol
-
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:16 pm
- Has liked: 39 times
- Likes received: 356 times
Re: So who had a clue...
Just what I was thinking.mazman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:33 pmWe are at a stage now where the consultation has been reopened so I believe the best avenue is to write in and voice your concerns.
They also said in their statement that we (recreational fishers) weren't the target of the proposal and I believe this indicates that the proposed changes weren't malicious towards fishos but rather ignored us, because we weren't the issue, without considering ramifications.
They missed us all together