Quick law check

All topics related to fishing and angling in Victoria that don't fit into one of the other forum categories.
Mattblack
Rank: Gummy Shark
Rank: Gummy Shark
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:08 pm
Location: South East Suburbs
Has liked: 625 times
Likes received: 298 times

Re: Quick law check

Post by Mattblack » Fri Dec 14, 2018 11:41 am

so if you can only have 4 rods in the water ('offshore'), can you still have a few extra rigged 'unused' rods in the boat with you?

User avatar
hornet
Rank: Premium Member
Rank: Premium Member
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:55 am
Location: Melbourne
Has liked: 123 times
Likes received: 258 times

Re: Quick law check

Post by hornet » Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:00 pm

I read it as rods in use... all other rods rigged but not in use are fine left in the rack.

When I go pier fishing I usually bring 8 rods in my fishing trolley but only use 2 to 4 depending on the species I'm targeting.
He who has the most fishing rods WINS ! :ts:

User avatar
bowl
Rank: Premium Member
Rank: Premium Member
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:30 pm
Location: Wyndham Vale
Has liked: 292 times
Likes received: 559 times

Re: Quick law check

Post by bowl » Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:27 pm

Lines in water.
To many boats kayak, helicopter , catch a fish,catch a fish

frozenpod
Rank: Premium Member
Rank: Premium Member
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:04 pm
Has liked: 81 times
Likes received: 109 times

Re: Quick law check

Post by frozenpod » Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:55 pm

greggo wrote:I got fined years ago under the Westgate fishing for Jewies. I had two rods out while fishing for live bait with another. It is classed as an estuary, so only two rods allowed. Fair enough too, my bad, I should have known better.
That is harsh mate as the dividing line is the imaginary line on the downstream side of the bridge.

skronkman
Rank: Premium Member
Rank: Premium Member
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2014 8:59 pm
Has liked: 4 times
Likes received: 40 times

Re: Quick law check

Post by skronkman » Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:57 pm

Conceivably you could fish the downstream section of the Yarra below the imaginary line at the bridge (designated as marine waters) with 4 rods and at the same time fish above that imaginary line (designated as inland waters) with 2 rods. This being a total of 6 rods. How is this viewed by authorities? I couldn't see anything in the rules to clarify this unlikely scenario apon brief inspection.

repspec
Rank: Cephalopod
Rank: Cephalopod
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:28 am
Has liked: 11 times
Likes received: 24 times

Re: Quick law check

Post by repspec » Fri Dec 14, 2018 2:24 pm

Kimtown wrote:
Are these laws somewhat recent? I've seen videos of Lee Rayner whiting fishing with like 10+ rods in the water.
i would imagine he would have extra people in the boat.
Its all about what is allowed per person. Realistically he should only be fishing 2 or 4 (depending on situation) as "he" is the one technically fishing, however once the camera is off, an extra person is fishing right away.

greggo
Rank: Silver Trevally
Rank: Silver Trevally
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:05 am
Location: Berwick
Has liked: 5 times
Likes received: 50 times

Re: Quick law check

Post by greggo » Fri Dec 14, 2018 2:45 pm

frozenpod wrote:[quote="greggo"
That is harsh mate as the dividing line is the imaginary line on the downstream side of the bridge.
I was about 200 metres upstream from the bridge, so well and truly inland water.

User avatar
bowl
Rank: Premium Member
Rank: Premium Member
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:30 pm
Location: Wyndham Vale
Has liked: 292 times
Likes received: 559 times

Re: Quick law check

Post by bowl » Fri Dec 14, 2018 2:46 pm

repspec wrote:
Kimtown wrote:
Are these laws somewhat recent? I've seen videos of Lee Rayner whiting fishing with like 10+ rods in the water.
i would imagine he would have extra people in the boat.
Its all about what is allowed per person. Realistically he should only be fishing 2 or 4 (depending on situation) as "he" is the one technically fishing, however once the camera is off, an extra person is fishing right away.
Must be a bloody slow bite if he is solo n has 10 kgw rods out lol
To many boats kayak, helicopter , catch a fish,catch a fish

User avatar
ducky
Rank: Premium Member
Rank: Premium Member
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:17 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Likes received: 332 times

Re: Quick law check

Post by ducky » Fri Dec 14, 2018 3:02 pm

In Vic it’s lines in the water as stated. In nsw I think it is it’s rigged rods. From memory and don’t quote meyou could only have 2 rods rigged per person on the Murray for example. You could have other rods but couldn’t have lures attached.

BIG GAV
Rank: Gummy Shark
Rank: Gummy Shark
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 10:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Likes received: 10 times

Re: Quick law check

Post by BIG GAV » Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:59 pm

Kimtown wrote:
greggo wrote:I got fined years ago under the Westgate fishing for Jewies. I had two rods out while fishing for live bait with another. It is classed as an estuary, so only two rods allowed. Fair enough too, my bad, I should have known better.
Hmmm pretty stiff I reckon

Anyone know why there's a difference between inland and offshore?

Are these laws somewhat recent? I've seen videos of Lee Rayner whiting fishing with like 10+ rods in the water.
Probably had a whole camera crew and his kids n mrs in the boat.. hence legal hahaha

Post Reply

Return to “General”