x 2! 8-)ducky wrote:I'll enter. The rules are pretty shitty though. Who made those up? Haha
Well done Dougie for taking it on!
cheers
Jim
x 2! 8-)ducky wrote:I'll enter. The rules are pretty shitty though. Who made those up? Haha
DougieK wrote:Fishn104 wrote:I'll be in this one again. Was good fun!! Just a suggestion dougie, 60/20/20 should be 1st 2nd 3rd overall, just because if your first you are most likely to be 2nd or third aswell (if that makes sense). One more thing would be a new code word. Thanks
Thanks for the note. It's not 1-2-3 it's best overall, best salt total and best fresh total I have added the following clarification to the original post:
"60/20/20 :- 60% for overall longest total cm achieved. 20% for longest freshwater total and 20% for longest saltwater total."
I'll post a new code word at midday on Saturday and we can get going. Hopefully attract a few more entries this time!
Yeah, this makes sense, when I used to work at a TAB you couldn't sell a multi bet o the footy, with a win, and most goals for example, for this reason.Brett wrote:DougieK wrote:Fishn104 wrote:I'll be in this one again. Was good fun!! Just a suggestion dougie, 60/20/20 should be 1st 2nd 3rd overall, just because if your first you are most likely to be 2nd or third aswell (if that makes sense). One more thing would be a new code word. Thanks
Thanks for the note. It's not 1-2-3 it's best overall, best salt total and best fresh total I have added the following clarification to the original post:
"60/20/20 :- 60% for overall longest total cm achieved. 20% for longest freshwater total and 20% for longest saltwater total."
I'll post a new code word at midday on Saturday and we can get going. Hopefully attract a few more entries this time!
Dougie, can I suggest another amendment
Would it be wise to add, that the 1st place getter, (overall length), is not eligible for the other 2 categories/places. As it's a fair chance that the person that wins, will take out atleast 1 other category, if not both.
Brett wrote: Would it be wise to add, that the 1st place getter, (overall length), is not eligible for the other 2 categories/places. As it's a fair chance that the person that wins, will take out atleast 1 other category, if not both.
I think this idea is better for the reason explained.Fishn104 wrote:That's what I was trying to say before. It's most likely the person who would win it will win either the fresh or salt as well. I think there should be a 1st 2nd and third for an overall length. That way you would be more willing to target everything coz there is something for first second and third. I think there would be more hope in everyone having a chance to win that way.
DougieK wrote:I like Fishn and SS's ideas as well. I'll leave it open until tomorrow morning for anyone else to make their case. 1-2-3 encourages completeness of angling ability rather than just salt or fresh water aptitude but might result in less people entering.